<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Ford Gives MakerBot 3D Printers to its Engineering Staff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://on3dprinting.com/2012/12/22/ford-gives-3d-printers-to-its-engineers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://on3dprinting.com/2012/12/22/ford-gives-3d-printers-to-its-engineers/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ford-gives-3d-printers-to-its-engineers</link>
	<description>Tracking the emerging 3D Printing revolution!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Werner</title>
		<link>http://on3dprinting.com/2012/12/22/ford-gives-3d-printers-to-its-engineers/#comment-7677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Werner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://on3dprinting.com/?p=2252#comment-7677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many, but most of them only for early prototypes. The better but way more costly choice would be the new Objet 1000 due to the size, still with limitations when it comes to real cars.
I guess that the idea behind this program is to boost the creativity of their engineers, as like as Google allows their employees to spend 10% of their time on private projects.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many, but most of them only for early prototypes. The better but way more costly choice would be the new Objet 1000 due to the size, still with limitations when it comes to real cars.<br />
I guess that the idea behind this program is to boost the creativity of their engineers, as like as Google allows their employees to spend 10% of their time on private projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Werner</title>
		<link>http://on3dprinting.com/2012/12/22/ford-gives-3d-printers-to-its-engineers/#comment-7676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Werner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://on3dprinting.com/?p=2252#comment-7676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With experience with FDM, STL and Polyjet, among other more traditional technologies, on projects ranging from one to millions copies, yes, there are limitations in all of these technologies. In lifetime I do not expect any new technology being able to reproduce all - or even many - manufacturing methods in one, simple process.
As explained in the video, FDM is good enough to evolve an new shift knob design, but you may not want to use that in your 30k$ car, e.g. it may fail in cold or hot environments. It is also obvious that FDM can&#039;t do engine parts, it will not help much for the windshield or the electronics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With experience with FDM, STL and Polyjet, among other more traditional technologies, on projects ranging from one to millions copies, yes, there are limitations in all of these technologies. In lifetime I do not expect any new technology being able to reproduce all &#8211; or even many &#8211; manufacturing methods in one, simple process.<br />
As explained in the video, FDM is good enough to evolve an new shift knob design, but you may not want to use that in your 30k$ car, e.g. it may fail in cold or hot environments. It is also obvious that FDM can&#8217;t do engine parts, it will not help much for the windshield or the electronics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: on3dprinting</title>
		<link>http://on3dprinting.com/2012/12/22/ford-gives-3d-printers-to-its-engineers/#comment-7608</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[on3dprinting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 22:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://on3dprinting.com/?p=2252#comment-7608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon- Interesting point. Do you see limitations of prototyping using FDM?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon- Interesting point. Do you see limitations of prototyping using FDM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://on3dprinting.com/2012/12/22/ford-gives-3d-printers-to-its-engineers/#comment-7607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 22:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://on3dprinting.com/?p=2252#comment-7607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ford is ahead of the game but I&#039;m unsure what car components could be built using FDM - even roughly... would have been better with a high-end  group printer in my opinion.

Jon
Founder of CNCKing.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford is ahead of the game but I&#8217;m unsure what car components could be built using FDM &#8211; even roughly&#8230; would have been better with a high-end  group printer in my opinion.</p>
<p>Jon<br />
Founder of CNCKing.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
